The Subjectivity of Antisemitism and its Consequences

With President Donald Trump’s House resolution 221, and the new Biden administration, antisemitism has taken new purpose as an ever-expanding tool of censorship. Dr. E. Michael Jones and Dana Pavlick discuss the ambiguity of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, as well as its true understanding through the traditional Church.

The impact of laws like these pose to threaten the livelihood and rights of all who live under such rule, even to the point of tyranny.

Coronavirus and the Church

The C-19 Scare is but the latest attempt by oligarchy to keep the world’s wealth concentrated in their hands. This will entail keeping the world’s peoples’ minds’ concentrated on imbibing their lies. The “cure” they would sell the people is the very means by which they kill the people- even physically, as well as by which they make a killing. The drug AZT, the “cure” to the AIDS epidemic (the C-Virus of its day- the 1980s and 90s, ) for which unleashing Dr. Anthony Fauci bears responsibility, provides a metaphorical key to understanding the cure which will be imposed on the world’s people, its economy and its civil law and liberties, especially as it pertains to Church/ State relations, if these criminals are not stopped. The Bishops of the Catholic Church, particularly those of the United States, must wield their authority to halt the spread of these men’s wicked plans but that will require them to get off AZT themselves: the AZT of Gospel Denialism when it comes to the necessity of conversion. If they want to genuinely heal the world, they must get off the AZT given to them by the oligarchs which comes to them dressed, sometimes as “Dialogue” and sometimes as science. But it is a fake dialogue and a fake science, and as such should not be taken as the voice of Ultimate Reality.